Any scientific analysis is only as accurate as the
least accurate input. Gross errors in structure orientation, solar
system sizing, collector placement, component specification, and
scientific studies can result when designers/engineers fail to accurately
assess shading patterns at proposed building/ecological sites.
By combining the site-specific shading data of the
Solar Pathfinder™ with the published solar radiation figures
(by NREL for USA), an accurate solar site analysis can be made.
This insolation data, on an hourly and monthly basis can then be
applied to architectural, engineering, solar, and ecological applications.
The Solar Pathfinder™ is non-electronic. Simple
and straight-forward in its engineering, it requires no special
skills or technical know-how. One simple tracing does the
job and becomes the permanent record for the solar data. When properly
cared for, the unit will give the user years of accurate site analysis.
The Solar Pathfinder™ uses a highly polished,
transparent, convex plastic dome to give a panoramic view of the
entire site. All the trees, buildings or other obstacles to the
sun are plainly visible as reflections on the surface of the dome.
The sunpath diagram can be seen through the transparent dome at
the same time. This diagram is latitude specific [the further away
from the equator, the lower the sun will be in the sky, thereby
making the sunpath further from the center of the unit] and shows
the sun’s average path for each month. The rays of the diagram
depict solar time. The diagram itself is therefore calibrated to
give solar insolation data for all the hours of the day and all
the days of the year. The diagram is also specific to the application:
“South-facing” (for Northern hemisphere) or “vertical”
is for applications of 20-90 degrees tilt – usually solar;
“Horizontal” is for applications of 0-20 degrees tilt
– usually ecological.
Because the Solar Pathfinder™ works
on a reflective principle rather than actually showing shadows,
it can be used anytime of the day, anytime of the year, in either
cloudy or clear weather. The actual position of the sun
at the time of the solar site analysis is irrelevant. In fact, the
unit is easier to use in the absence of direct sunlight. It could
even be used on a moonlit night.
The Pathfinder has an integral bubble level and magnetic
compass to facilitate quick instrument set-up. The unit and diagrams
are engineered to adjust for magnetic declination to face “true
south” (for Northern hemisphere), not “magnetic south”.
A locking mechanism secures the adjustment.
Once the Solar Pathfinder™ has been properly
set up, the user traces the outline of the horizon’s reflection
seen on the dome onto the underlying diagram by inserting a white
marking pen (included) through the slots on the side of the unit.
The traced line shows exactly at what hours of the day and months
of the year an obstacle will shade that particular location. The
picture below shows a Solar Pathfinder™ being used at a typical
solar site. Notice how the reflected image of the tree-line is sighted
coincidentally with the diagram below it. The diagram, also pictured,
is a site tracing of the same site. The tracing becomes a permanent
record of the solar data.
The small numbers across the arcs represent the percentage of solar
insolation in half-hour segments throughout the day – each
month’s arc totaling 100%. The sum of the unshaded numbers
along a particular monthly sunpath represent the percent of the
total available solar energy for an average day during that month,
as compared to a completely unobstructed site.
In
the example tracing above, this particular site has only 78%
solar availability for December [obtained by adding the unshaded
numbers along the December sunpath (7+8+8+8+8+7+7+6+5+4). August
had 97% solar availability (1+2+2+3+4+5+6+6+7+7+7+7+7+7+6+6+5+4+3+2).
To translate the Site Percent value obtained as above
to kWh/m2/day, take the solar radiation data based on unobstructed
site (as collected by the NREL for the USA – this data is
included with the unit) for the desired tilt and tracking mechanism
(i.e. fixed, 1-axis, 2-axis, etc.) and multiply it by the daily
Site Percent. For example:
The
December average value listed for San Francisco, using a south-facing
flat-plate collector tilted at latitude (between 37-38 degrees
tilt) for a fixed collector is 3.4 kWh/m2/day. This figure,
when multiplied by the Site Percent value of the above diagram
site tracing of 78%, gives 2.652 kWh/m2/day for this site.
The
August average value listed for San Francisco, using a 2-axis
tracking flat-plate collector is 9.0. This figure, when multiplied
by the Site Percent value of the above diagram site tracing
of 97%, gives 8.73 kWh/m2/day for this site.
Ecological studies can use this same NREL insolation
data by using the “fixed tilt” chart at 0 degrees (horizontal)
tilt and using the same math.
Solar Insolation Data, such as the NREL data, takes
into account the specific climate of the city chosen. Local cloud
cover, smog, dust in the atmosphere, etc. are averaged in its insolation
values. Such data would be the only information needed if the site
was completely free of shade-producing objects such as trees, building,
etc. For specific sun/shade analysis of a given site, the Solar
Pathfinder™ is an invaluable tool that is both fast and accurate.
The basic questions that need to be answered to determine
the size of a solar collection system are:
1.
How much heat or electric
energy is needed?
2.
What type of collector will be used?
3.
How much energy will be lost between
the collector and the point of use?
4.
How much of the sun's energy that could
potentially reach your collector surface actually will? A percentage
of the sun's radiation can be blocked by trees, buildings, hills,
clouds, dust, water vapor in the air, and other things.
5.
How does the slope and
orientation of the collector affect the amount of solar energy
received?
The Solar Pathfinder instrument will help you answer
the fourth question. The Pathfinder is primarily designed to determine
the percentage of solar radiation blocked by permanent local features
in the landscape like trees, hills, and buildings. Climatic factors,
such as the amount of clouds, dust, and water vapor in the atmosphere
are constantly changing. We need to account for these climatic factors
to determine the average amount of solar radiation actually received
at a certain location at a certain time.
The best way to account for climatic effects is to
take actual solar radiation measurements with special radiation
measurement instruments. Clouds, dust, and water vapor scatter and
absorb a part of the incoming solar radiation. The amount of solar
radiation that actually reaches the earth's surface is measured
with these instruments. The best solar radiation data comes from
locations that have been collecting this data over a long time period.
This data contains average, maximum, and minimum values for the
amount of solar radiation that strikes the collectors at these locations.
The problem is that there are only a very small number of these
locations around the world.
How To Get Solar
Radiation Data
In the United States, a major program was undertaken
by NREL (National Renewable Energy Lab) to correlate sparse solar
radiation data with available weather data at nearby sites. These
correlations were used to estimate solar radiation for 239 sites
in the US with extensive weather records. The data for the 239 sites
is available in an excellent 250-page, 1994 publication called,
Solar Radiation Data Manual for Flat-Plate and Concentrating Collectors.
This is available electronically in more of a spreadsheet format
(click here to visit the website)
NREL is an excellent resource, and though it tends
toward the large utility scale projects, it is funded by your tax
dollars. If you have additional technical questions, try 303-275-4626
or 4648. Like most NREL numbers, you will likely get a machine.
The manual mentioned above has a page of tables for
each location. The data tables have columns for each month of the
year and an annual total. There are five tables: south facing fixed-tilt
collectors, 1-axis trackers, 2-axis trackers, direct-beam concentrating
collectors, and average climatic conditions. Units are metric (kilowatt-hour
per square meter per day). Most tables give average, maximum, and
minimum values for each month. The fixed and 1-axis tracker tables
are broken down into tilts of: horizontal, latitude minus 15 degrees,
latitude, and latitude plus 15 degrees. We try to include a copy
of your nearby locations with the instrument for US orders.
Sandia Laboratories publishes a useful manual: "Stand-Alone
Photovoltaic Systems, A Handbook of Recommended Design Practices"
(SAND87-7023) and Photovoltaic Power Systems and the National Electric
Code Suggested Practices (SAND96-2797). "Stand-Alone PV"
is a 400+ page reference that has 70 pages of radiation data, much
of it for locations outside the U.S. Data is monthly for fixed array,
1-axis trackers, and 2-axis trackers. Tilts include latitude minus
15 degrees, latitude, and latitude plus 15 degrees. Contoured world
maps are included for each season of the year and each of the three
tilts above. This can be ordered from Sandia
Laboratories at 505-844-4383
For areas of the world with very little solar radiation
data, NREL has a crude global data set that uses data inferred from
satellites. It gives rough numbers, as it gauges what is happening
at the bottom of the atmosphere from above the top of the atmosphere.
There are a number of people and organizations working
at different computer based systems for middle and large scale projects
that manipulate radiation and solar Pathfinder data. This field
is changing so fast that individuals are encouraged to do their
own research.
A simple installation of a few PV panels on a cabin
project could use the equivalent sun-hours per day chart that came
with the PV panel literature. This literature from some PV panel
manufacturers will give rough numbers, but will be very simple to
use. PV panels are usually rated as producing so many amps at near
ideal or peak sun conditions. Then the amp rating for the panel
can be multiplied by the number of peak sun-hours, to get the number
of amp-hours per day that can be produced by the panel.
One peak sun-hour is equivalent to one kilowatt-hour
per square meter per day when the PV panels' tilt has been optimized
for the entire year. The kilowatt-hour per square meter per day
is the unit for radiation data that is provided in the Solar Radiation
Data Manual available from NREL. The suggested tilt angle that is
optimum for the entire year is the one tilt angle where a PV panel
will produce the most electricity in a year's time.
The optimum tilt angle could be roughly estimated
as being the latitude of the location. Actually, the optimum tilt
may be as much as 10 degrees or more off a tilt equal to latitude.
For instance, if the summers are much sunnier than the winters,
then you will want to tilt the collector more toward the summer
sun for maximum gain, which means your tilt will be more horizontal
(less than your latitude).
Of course, most of your energy use may be in the
winter, so instead of maximizing total energy for the year, you
might want to maximize your winter collection by increasing the
angle of tilt.
There are many tradeoffs and considerations that
will play into sizing and orienting solar collectors and it will
be wise to use an installer-dealer with extensive background. (Many
advertise in Home Power Magazine referenced in Resources at the
back of this manual.)
Specific Aspects of PV System Siting and
Sizing
Photovoltaic panels are affected by partial shade
more than other types of collectors. Shade over a portion of the
panel can greatly limit power output. Partial shade from towers,
poles, deciduous trees and other objects would be considered nearly
the same as total shade for older panels. PV manufacturers are gradually
reducing this problem. Several locations should be evaluated to
find the one with the greatest collection potential.
Output will also be affected by the use of trackers,
or the number of fixed panel adjustments made during the year. Much
additional layman information can be gathered from the Stand-Alone
Photovoltaic Systems Manual from Sandia Labs, referenced under How
To Get Solar Radiation Data above.
To find the expected power output from fixed solar
panels:
Step 1: Use a South facing monthly
sun path diagram for your site tracing. Add the numbers in each
half-hour period for which there is no shading on the planned panel
array. For large arrays, two readings should be taken, at the east
and west bottom edges of the planned array. Both can be recorded
on the same sun path diagram. Then add the numbers in the half-hour
periods when there was no shading on either tracing to find the
percent of solar radiation available for each month.
Step 2: Multiply this percentage
by the radiation amount you obtained from one of the data sources
listed above. The radiation data gives you the number of kilowatt-hours
per day, or the number of peak-sun hours, which number wise is essentially
equivalent. (Peak sun-hours are also referred to as "sun-hours"
or "equivalent hours of peak output" or "optimum
sun-hours" by different sources. See an explanation of sun-hours
in How to Get Solar Radiation Data above.)
Step 3: Using the resultant number
of sun hours from Step 2 above, multiply by the optimum amps or
ampere output under full sun (available from the panel manufacturer)
to find the expected average ampere-hours per day for each month.
Multiply by the panel voltage to get watts per day.
Example: Using the site tracing
on page 10, add the numbers for the half-hour segments in December
when no shading will occur:
2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 +7 +7 +8 +8 +8 = 58%. In the NREL publication
under Grand Junction, CO, in December, a south facing fixed collector
tilted at latitude (which is 39 degrees) receives on average 4.1
kWh/m2/day (4.1 X .58 = 2.4 kWh/m2 day). This would be about 2.4
peak sun-hours per day for December at this site. Multiplying 2.4
by the panel manufacturer's value for optimum amps (let's use 3.02
amps) gives us 7.2 amp-hours per day. Multiply by voltage (let's
use 12v) gives us 86 watts per day.
Siting Domestic Hot Water
Collectors
The most ideal water heat collector orientation
will typically favor the winter months slightly, to make up for
shorter days and the cooling effect of colder temperatures. The
panel tilt might equal the latitude plus five to ten degrees. Although
partial shading isn't as critical with thermal collectors as with
PV panels, we still need to compensate for a high percentage of
morning or afternoon shade. To do this, we need to aim the panels
more to the west or east, and possibly increase the tilt.
Step 1: Using the diagram shown
on page 10, add the numbers in the un-shaded part of the October
sun path to find the site percent for October. For example, the
monthly sun path diagram on page 10 has an October reading of 71%.
Step 2: Divide this number by two
to find the half-day percentage. 71/2 = 35.5%; round up to 36.
Step 3: Start from the east edge
of the October sun path, add the un-shaded numbers until the total
is nearly the same as the half-day percentage. 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6
+ 6 + 7 = 33.
Step 4: Notice the place along the
October sun path where the half-day percentage is found, in relation
to 12 noon (true south). In our example, the half-day percentage
is found between 11:00 and 11:30 AM.
Step 5: Overlay the clear angle
measurement grid on top of the sun path diagram. Using the angle
numbers on the outside edge of the grid (the azimuth angle), find
the angle where the half-day point is located. Using our example,
for between 11 and 11:30 AM, the angle is 15 degrees. Therefore,
we would orient our collector 15 degrees east of south.
Step 6: To determine the collector's
tilt, use the azimuth angle found above (15 degrees in our example).
Divide the azimuth angle by 5 and add this figure to your latitude
to find the collector's tilt. As an example, use our 15 degrees
azimuth angle and our latitude of 39 degrees north. We would first
divide 15 by 5 to get 3, and then add this to the 39 degrees of
latitude to get a collector tilt of 42 degrees. This is due to the
greater percentage of energy coming in while the sun is lower in
the sky (i.e., morning or afternoon).
Siting Active Space Heating Collectors
Since space heating is a concern primarily during
the winter months, we will use the information from the January
sun path to orient the collector. (A good rule of thumb for panel
tilt is latitude plus 15 degrees.)
Step 1: Again using the diagram
shown on page 10, add the numbers in the un-shaded part of the January
sun path to find the site percent for January, and divide by two
to find the half-day percentage. Our example shows that the site
percentage is 64%. 64/2 = 32.
Step 2: Starting from the east edge
of the January sun path, add the un-shaded numbers to find the half-day
point. 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 = 27.
Step 3: Notice where this half-day
point is in relation to 12 noon (true south). In our example, the
half-day point is between 10:30 and 11:00 AM.
Step 4: Overlay the angle estimator
as above to find what your angle is. Our azimuth angle is 20 degrees.
We would orient our collector 20 degrees east of south.
Step 5: To determine the collector's
tilt, divide the azimuth angle by five and add this to your latitude
plus 15 degrees. In our example, 20/5 = 4. If our latitude is 39
degrees, add 15 plus the additional 4 degrees to get a collector
tilt of 58 degrees.
Estimating Rooftop Collector
Shading on the Future Home
Solar site analysis is difficult when trying to
estimate how much sunlight will strike the walls or roof of a building
that hasn't been put up yet. Usually the future rooftop will likely
be less shaded than the building site at the ground level.
Rooftop shading can sometimes be estimated by taking
two readings, one at ground level, and another one ten feet up a
stepladder. Any shift in the skyline between the two readings can
be used to estimate the correct rooftop solar reception by using
proportions. For example, shading reduced by half at the 10-foot
level would be approximately halved again at 20 feet. A third reading
could be taken from the roof of a nearby building (if one exists)
to help get a better perspective on shading patterns in the area.
As long as there were not significant potential shade
makers to the east and west, we also could go north of the site,
to a point at instrument level that is on a line of sight with the
future elevated collector.
Seasonal Variations in Foliage and
Ground Cover
Thumb rules:
1. Do not count any half-hour periods
shaded by evergreen trees, as they cast shadows year-round.
2. Do not count half-hour periods
shaded by deciduous trees during the leaf-bearing months; for thermal
collectors, count these half-hour periods at half their value during
non-leaf-bearing months. For PV panels, these half-hour periods
should be assigned a value of zero, unless the manufacturer can
support a better figure.
3. Snow cover should cause an increase
in the amount of solar radiation that a sloped collector receives
due to reflection. This increase depends on the latitude, the collector
tilt, and the kind of snow (new powder is best, decreasing as snow
becomes old and icy). The average increase of solar radiation used
for passive solar heating due to snow cover is only around five
percent, but PV panels on a powder-snow-covered, clear, cold winter
day often produce more watts than on the much longer sunny summer
days.